"When the Lord made man, all the parts of the body argued over who would be boss.
The brain explained, ”Since I control everything and do all the thinking, I should be the boss.”
The feet suggested, ”Since I carry man wherever he wants to go and get him in position to do what the brain wants, then I should be the boss.”
The hands argued, ”Since I must do all the work and earn all the money to keep the rest of you going, I should be the boss.”
And so it went with the eyes, the heart, the lungs, and all the other parts of the body, each giving the reason why they should be the boss.
Finally, the asshole spoke up and said it was going to be the boss.
All the other parts laughed and laughed at the idea of the asshole being the boss. The asshole got so mad that he closed up and refused to function.
After a few days, the brain grew feverish and could barely think, the feet felt like lead weights and were too weak to drag the body anywhere, the eyes got crossed and couldn’t see, and the hands hung useless at the sides. They all conceded and made the asshole boss
And so it happened; all the other parts did all the work and the asshole just bossed and passed out a lot of crap.
THE MORAL: You don’t have to be a brain to be a boss, just an asshole.
Alternate moral: No matter how well things are going, it can all be shut down by a single asshole.”
"Colonel. Edward S. Van Duyn attended the Unitarian Church during his life--a church which has long been associated with Wicca. He also associated with the liberal Presbyterians. In 1933, he founded the Planned Parenthood Center of Syracuse, New York. Planned Parenthood Federation of America was an Illuminati inspired organization that was set up to accomplish several objectives. The organization?s own stated purpose is very revealing: "To provide leadership m: making effective means of voluntary fertility regulation, including contraception, abortion, sterilization, and infertility services, available and fully accessible to all as a central element of reproductive health; stimulating and sponsoring relevant biomedical, socioeconomic, and demographic research; developing appropriate information, education, and training programs to increase knowledge about human reproduction and sexuality." Planned Parenthood Federation of America has about 190 affiliated organizations and actively promotes its agenda all over the world. It operates about 900 centers in the U.S. It maintains a 5,000 volume library on abortion, sterilization, and population control. One of its leaders Alan F. Guttmacher signed the Humanist Manifesto, and the president Faye Wattleton was awarded "Humanist of the year" in 1986. Both hate Christians. Margaret Sanger, who advocated neo-Malthusian population controls, with money from her husband and rich backers, started the American Birth Control League (ABCL) in 1921. The ABCL opened up the Birth Control Research Bureau (BCCRB) in 1923. In 1939 the ABCL and another similar group merged to form the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA) which in 1942 changed its name to Planned Parenthood Federation. Consider the changes that have happened within our lifetimes. In 1957, birth control devices were outlawed in all NY metropolitan hospitals. In 1969, the Federal government was subsidizing abortions and birth control through the federal antipoverty program. In the 1980s, public schools started offering condoms and new types of sex education programs for teenagers. The Schlesinger Library has been actively keeping historical records of the "family planning movement" and David Kennedy wrote the book Birth Control in America: The Career of Margaret Sanger in 1970. Much of what has happened in abortions, birth control research, and population control mechanisms has come as a result of these type of organizations. I was curious-WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE WANT US STERILIZED, OUR BABIES ABORTED, AND THE WORLD?S POPULATION REDUCED? What kind of people are funding the enormous amount of money it takes to get people to abort their babies? What does it cost to get a population to voluntarily neuter themselves? I randomly picked a year (1984) to research the funding for Planned Parenthood and the Planned Parenthood branches. I was astounded at how hugh the sums of money that the elite spend in just one year to get us to castrate ourselves and tie our tubes, and abort our babies. I have divided the list of Foundations that donated money to Planned Parenthood in just the single year of 1984 into two categories. The first category are Foundations that I can identify having connections to the Illuminati. The others are all the rest, and I suspect this second group has many that tie back too, I most likely haven?t figured out how.
ILLUMINATI CONNECTED FOUNDATIONS DONATING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION & BRANCHES -- and the amounts donated in 1984,
Vincent ASTOR Foundation -- $150,000
Mary Duke BIDDLE Foundation -- $5,000
DODGE Foundation -- $115,000 (the DuPonts are behind GM)
FORD Foundation -- $200,000 (McGeorge Bundy was Pres. of Ford Found.)
William Randolph HEARST Foundation -- $10,000
(Freemason) Jessee H. Jones? HOUSTON Endowment -- $30,000
Eli LILLY & CO. Foundation -- $10,000
LILLY Endowment -- $100,000
Andrew W. MELLON Foundation -- $970,000
Richard King MELLON Foundation -- $55,000
(Jewish Rosicrucian) Fred MEYER Charitable Fund - $10,000
MORGAN Guaranty Trust -- $31,000
Jessie Smith NOYES Foundation -- $152,400
J.N. PEW Memorial Trust -- $730,000
PRUDENTIAL Foundation -- $8,000
Kate B. REYNOLDS Charitable Trust -- $25,000
Z.S. REYNOLDS Foundation -- $30,000
Russeil SAGE Foundation -- $5,000
Max STERN Foundation -- $20,000
Levi STRAUSS Foundation -- $5,000
OTHER FOUNDATIONS CONTRIBUTING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD- (Some of these may well also
have the Illuminati behind them.)
AHMANSON Foundation -- $125,600
Theodore & Beulah BEASLEY Foundation -- $100,000
ALLEN-BRADLEY Foundation -- $15,000
Worthington BENEDUM Foundation -- $15,000
Otto BREMER Foundation -- $7,500
Gwendolyn CAFRITZ Foundation -- $50,000
Lewis CALDER Foundation -- $20,000
CHAMPLIN Foundation -- $25,000
CENTRAL N.Y. COMMUNITY Foundation -- $125,000
CHARLOTTE Foundation -- $6,250
Robert Sterling CLARK Foundation -- $200,000
Clark Foundation -- $15,000
Olive B. COLE Foundation -- $30,000
Commonwealth Fund -- $200,500
DOLFINGER-MCMAHON Foundation -- $5,000
EDUCATIONAL Foundation of America -- $50,000
OP. & W.E. EDWARDS Foundation -- $15,000
Samuel S. FELS Fund -- $5,000
FIELD Foundation -- $40,000
GEBBIE Foundation -- $10,945
GENERAL MILLS Foundation -- $15,000
Wallace Alexander GERBODE Foundation -. $16,000
Morris GOLDSEKER Foundation -- $30,000
George GUND Foundation -- $108,096
Walter HAAS Foundation -- $7,870
Adah F. HALL Charity Fund -- $11,000
Ewing HALSELL Foundation -- $25,000
William HEWLETT Foundation -- $850,000
Dayton HUDSON Foundation -- $10,000
HUMBOLDT Area Foundation -- $35,000
JEWETT Foundation (of CALIF) -- $12,500 (gave to ID & WA Planned Parenthood)
Walter S. JOHNSON Foundation -- $147,506
KALAMAZOO Foundation -- $32,656
J.M. Kaplan Fund -- $50,000
KECK Foundation --$15,0(X)
Peter Kiewit Foundation -- $45,000
KRANNERT Charitable Trust -- $150,000
MANSANTO Fund -- $5,000
MEDICAL Trust -- $600,000
METROPOLITAN Life Foundation -- $7,500
MCCUNE Foundation -- $10,000
MCGREGOR Foundation -- $5,000
MCKNIGHT Foundation -- $35,000
MUSKEGON County Community Foundation -- $6,000
NEEDMOR Fund -- $30,000
Edward John NOBLE Foundation -- $80,000
NORTON Co. Foundation -- $25,000
PACKARD Foundation -- $100,636
PASADENA Foundation -- $5,000
PITON Foundation -- $80,000
PITTSBURGH Foundation -- $55,000
PHILADELPHIA Foundation -- $23.000
PUBLIC Welfare Foundation -- $30,000
RIPLEY Memorial Foundation -- $5,000
SAN FRANCISCO Foundation -- $32,209
SANTA BARBARA Foundation -- $20,000
Florence & John SCHUMAN -- $25,000
William G. SELBY Foundation -- $18,700
SKILLMAN Foundation -- $30,000
Harry G. STEELE Foundation -- $418,950
Eloise & Richard WEBBER Foundation -- $20,000
WESTERN Electric Fund -- $6,000
Robert WILSON Foundation -- $50,000
"If the reader is wondering what happened that some of the other top Illuminati families are not on the above list, the reason why is that the other families were supporting other organizations similar to Planned Parenthood Foundation which are also working to promote sterilizations, abortions, and sexual promiscuity. For instance, the Rockefeller family runs hundreds of foundations, and just two of these --the ones named after the Rockefellers-supported the following groups in 1984 which have the same goals and agenda as Planned Parenthood-- Center for Population Options (donation given - $29,730), Population Council ($1,235,000), Alan Guttmacher Institute ($300,000) this is a dangerous organization doing research to promote these things, Population Institute ($10,000). On top of this, in 1984 the Red Chinese Academy of Medical Science was given several Rockefeller grants to do contraceptive, sterilization, and genetic research. One of these was a $6,647 grant given to the Red Chinese Academy of Medical Science to study male contraceptives. Has abortion, sterilization, sexual promisculty, population control, and genetic research been part of the Illuminati?s long range plan? You bet. But it was important that the Illuminati convince the experts, (at least the experts they control) that these things were needed to save mankind. Three studies were made by the elite to determine that a population explosion was threatening the earth. according to William Cooper in Behold a Pale Horse, pp. 166-67. The first was during W.W. II, the second at Huntsville, AL in 1957, and the third by the Club of Rome ending in 1968. All three studies concluded that population growth must be curtailed. Last year at a meeting of the elite, George Hunt obtained a handout which shows that the elite are committed to stopping the population growth by any means available. Years earlier, Illuminatus Dr. Aurelio Peccei advocated a plague similar to the Black Plague, and when the idea was developed it became the AIDs epidemic. The Illuminati have the cure for AIDS. Actually, there are many cures for AIDS But the one they had before the AIDS epidemic began will not be given to the population until enough people die, or until the elite are exposed enough that they are forced to give out the cure. Dr. Wolf Szmuness. Pope John Paul II?s ex-roomate was one of the masterminds behind the AIDS epidemic. The National Security Council has had an ad hoc group on Population Policy to strongly encourage other nations to have birth control, abortions, and sterilizations. This group drafted the Global 2000 Report which was given to Carter. Whether the population explosion is a threat or not--(having travelled world-wide and having a father who was considered one of the better agricultural scientists, I contend it is not a threat)- -the world?s elite believe it, and they make the decisions. Further, they have a vested interest, an immoral need to believe in the overpopulation lie."
"Sorry, the page you requested was not found.
The story or page you were trying to access may have expired."
Reminds me of Catholics and Protestants in N Ireland. I remember when Catholics were 1/3; now, I gather, they are 1/2. Correct me if I am wrong.
Other thing about N Ireland, which might have a parallel in Holy Land: in film** Meaning of Life, after the Every Sperm is Sacred song scene, there is an old childless Protestant couple who apparently despise the Catholics for being fruitful and multiplying. If there be such an attitude prevailing among Israelis - may God avert it - that does not bode well for peace in the area ...
*link disabled, but I replace it by this quote
**by Monty Python, I recall
1:04pm Monday, Jan 8
yeah I don't normally do these but when it comes to relationships and symbollism I'm a sucker. ...BIG time sucker for symbollism. So, here's what i found:
Kiss on the stomach-----"lets have sex"
*Kiss on the Forehead ----"Forever you will be mine"
*Kiss on the Ear ---"I'm horny"
*Kiss on the Cheek ---"We're friends"
*Kiss on the Hand ---"I adore you"
*Kiss on the Neck ---"We belong together"
*Kiss on the Shoulder ---"I want you"
*Kiss on the Lips ---"I love you" OR "I want you"
What the gesture means...
*Holding Hands ---"We can learn to love each other"
*Slap on the Butt ---"That's mine"
*Playing with the Ear ---"I can't live without you"
*Holding on tight ---"Don't let go"
*Looking into each other's Eyes ---"Don't leave me"
*Playing with Hair on Head ---"Tell me you love me"
*Arms around the Waist ---"I love you too much to let go"
*Laughing while Kissing ---"I am completely Comfortable with you"
* Dont ask for a kiss, take one.
If you LIKE, LOVE, OR MISS someone right now and can't get them out of your head then Re-post this within One Minute and Whoever you are missing will surprise you. Repost this as " What a kiss means"
Wednesday, December 12, 2007 at 11:27am
”Upon the immediate logical and legal origin of the English interest there can be no rational debate. There are some things so simple that one can almost prove them with plans and diagrams, as in Euclid. One could make a kind of comic calendar of what would have happened to the English diplomatist if he had been silenced every time by Prussian diplomacy. Suppose we arrange it in the form of a kind of diary.
”July 24. Germany invades Belgium.
”July 25. England declares war.
”July 26. Germany promises not to annex Belgium.
”July 27. England withdraws from the war.
”July 28. Germany annexes Belgium. England declares war.
”July 29. Germany promises not to annex France. England withdraws from the war.
”July 30. Germany annexes France. England declares war.
”July 31. Germany promises not to annex England.
”Aug. 1. England withdraws from the war. Germany invades England...
”How long is anybody expected to go with that sort of game, or keep peace at that illimitable price? How long must we pursue a road in which promises are all fetishes in front of us and all fragments behind us? No: upon the cold facts of the final negotiations, as told by any of the diplomatists in any of the documents, there is no doubt about the story. And no doubt about the villain of the story.”
The Appetite of Tyranny
Unfortunately there are modern parallels, not between states (unless UN/US be Prussia) as much as between state (or statesponsored new classes of authority) and citizen.
Let Chesterton continue:
”These are the last facts--the facts which involved England. It is equally easy to state the first facts--the facts which involved Europe. The Prince who practically ruled Austria was shot by certain persons whom the Austrian Government believed to be conspirators from Servia. The Austrian Government piled up arms and armies, but said not a word either to Servia their suspect or Italy their ally. From the documents it would seem that Austria kept everybody in the dark, except Prussia. It is probably nearer the truth to say that Prussia kept everybody in the dark, including Austria. But all that is what is called opinion, belief, conviction or common-sense, and we are not dealing with it here. The objective fact is that Austria told Servia to permit Servian officers to be suspended by the authority of Austrian officers, and told Servia to submit to this within forty-eight hours. In other words, the sovereign of Servia was practically told to take off not only the laurels of two great campaigns but his own lawful and national crown, and to do it in a time in which no respectable citizen is expected to discharge an hotel bill. Servia asked for time, for arbitration--in short, for peace. But Prussia had already begun to mobilise; and Prussia, presuming that Servia might thus be rescued, declared war.
”Between these two ends of fact, the ultimatum to Servia, the ultimatum to Belgium, any one so inclined can of course talk as if everything were relative. If any one ask why the Czar should rush to the support of Servia, it is as easy to ask why the Kaiser should rush to the support of Austria. If any one say that the French would attack the Germans, it is sufficient to answer that the Germans did attack the French. There remain, however, two attitudes to consider, even perhaps two arguments to counter, which can best be considered and countered under this general head of facts. First of all, there is a curious, cloudy sort of argument, much affected by the professional rhetoricians of Prussia, who are sent out to instruct and correct the minds of Americans or Scandinavians. It consists of going into convulsions of incredulity and scorn at the mention of Russia’s responsibility for Servia or England’s responsibility for Belgium; and suggesting that, treaty or no treaty, frontier or no frontier,Russia would be out to slay Teutons or England to steal colonies. Here, as elsewhere, I think the professors dotted all over the Baltic plain fail in lucidity, and in the power of distinguishing ideas. Of course it is quite true that England has material interests to defend, and will probably use the opportunity to defend them: or, in other words, of course England, like everybody else, would be more comfortable if Prussia were less predominant. The fact remains that we did not do what the Germans did. We did not invade Holland to seize a naval and commercial advantage: and whether they say that we wished to do it in our greed, or feared to do it in our cowardice, the fact remains that we did not do it. Unless this common-sense principle be kept in view, I cannot conceive how any quarrel can possibly be judged.”