Craig Crawford's view on Harry Potter (feat. réprise of his view on Tolkien and CSL, feat. Dan Brown)

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Were the Inklings a Forbidden Society? No. · HGL'S F.B. WRITINGS : Craig Crawford's view on Harry Potter (feat. réprise of his view on Tolkien and CSL, feat. Dan Brown) · CSL Not Arian · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Commenting on Schnoebelen's at al:s comments on HP

Craig Crawford

"est avec Timotheos Michelantoine KastrophilakasNikolaou et 5 autres personnes."

15 septembre, 01:18 ·

Hans-Georg, It's not that I disagree that debate is not sometimes useful in certain circumstances, however, I consider my time to be precious and valuable, and I have much important work to do that consumes a lot of my time. It takes a great deal of energy, and I simply do not choose to expend the energy required for lengthy debates with anyone. It's draining. You seem to me to be hardened and set in your Roman Catholicism, and I am doubtful that many hours of debate and disputation with you would bring forth much in the way of fruit.

Since you are the one who brought up 666...

Why do you think Harry has a mark on his forehead, which is also called a curse multiple times, in the shape of a lightning bolt?

Hagrid: "Never wondered how you got that mark on yer forehead? That was no ordinary cut. That’s what yeh get when a powerful, evil curse touches yeh — took care of yer mum an’ dad an’ yer house, even —"

So Harry Potter is marked in the forehead with a powerful evil curse in the shape of a lightning bolt.

And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven. (Luke 10:18)

Harry Potter is marked in the forehead and cursed with the sign of Satan, a lightning bolt. He is obviously the young Antichrist. I take it that both Timothy and yourself are not real familiar with the novels or films, or you could easily recognize this.

Why do you think that the first Potter book published in the name of J.K. Rowling states:

"There have been many reports of the Sorcerer’s Stone over the centuries, but the only Stone currently in existence belongs to Mr. Nicolas Flamel, the noted alchemist and opera lover. Mr. Flamel, who celebrated his six hundred and sixty-fifth birthday last year..."

If Nicholas Flamel celebrated his 665th birthday last year, this is just a cryptic way of saying he is 666 this year. Why would the supposed author of these novels deliberately put cryptic 666 references in the book? By the way, in case you are unfamiliar with the story, Harry Potter and his pals go on a quest and seek after this Sorcerer's Stone of Nicholas Flamel at the end of the novel, and Harry obtains it.

Let's not be so naive. The committee of occultists that actually wrote this series of books have purposefully woven all sorts of hidden and cryptic occult references, and a lengthy and thorough examination would be necessary to demonstrate that some simple-minded divorced soccer mom did not come up with this book series and supposedly become richer than the Queen of England all by her lonesome.

The Harry Potter books were deliberately written with the express purpose of undermining Christian doctrine. All the occult practices condemned by the Church have purposefully been woven into and promoted in these books by a committee of writers steeped in the occult.

That the secret society uses front-authors to manipulate and propagandize the unsuspecting public is even tacitly admitted. They even made an episode of the Simpsons demonstrating this, for example.

"The Book Job"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_Job

"In the episode, Lisa is shocked to discover that all popular young-adult novels are not each written by a single author with any inspiration, but are conceived by book publishing executives through use of market research and ghostwriters to make money."

"Actor Andy García, who appears in that series as a casino owner, guest starred in "The Book Job" as the book publishing executive. It also contains several references to and parodies of the Harry Potter and Twilight series, aimed at young adults."

As one can see, in this Simpsons episode from 2011, they are practically openly admitting what I said publicly years before, that J.K. Rowling is a merely front-author for the secret society preparing to enthrone Antichrist, and that committees of writers steeped in the occult, and employed by the secret society, compose all the popular books published today, and yes Tolkien and Lewis were also front-authors for this same secret society, and their works also promote magic and wizardry and pagan practices and heresies condemned by the Church.

I can assure you, the secret society which has long been preparing and laying the groundwork to enthrone the Antichrist has thoroughly controlled the mainstream book publishing industry long before Tolkien and Lewis were even born.

You say: "I think HP and Lord of the Rings are in fact two different leagues, since the books have been in print (all three volumes) since 1955. This is well before the Twin Towers were even built."

If you had the opportunity to read my work in the last few years, you would know that I have both asserted and demonstrated that the secret society planned the destruction of the WTC Twin Towers long before they were ever built and before Osama bin Laden was even born. They purposefully built the Towers with the intention of destroying them decades later.

In fact they purposefully began construction on the World Trade Center Towers in 1968, the same year that they introduced the 911 emergency call number. A few weeks after construction on the North Tower began in August 1968, they say Mohamed Atta, the purported lead-hijacker and ringleader of 9/11, who supposedly piloted Flight 11 into the North Tower (a fabrication), was born, September 1, 1968, in Egypt.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was released 1 September 1998 in the US, the 30th birthday of Mohamed Atta, the so-called ringleader of 9/11 and the mythological 19 hijackers.

Joanne Rowling's date of birth is reportedly 31 July 1965, and this was arranged by the secret society for one of the supposed hijackers supposedly accompanying Atta on Flight 11, Wail al-Shehri 31 July 1973. (never happened)

Her name Rowling is pronounced "Rolling" for the mythological story of "Let's Roll" and Flight 93 on September 11, 2001.

Flight 11 was supposedly the first flight to be hijacked (the mythology about the hijackings is not real but merely a fabrication), and the first to purportedly crash into the North Tower, 1WTC.

Of course September 11, 2001 was a Tuesday (dedicated by the pagans to Mars, the god of war), and that is why the first novel (and film) focuses on Harry Potter's 11th birthday, which falls on a Tuesday.

Harry's mean uncle takes him and the family (a total of 4 members for the 4 attacks of 9/11) out to an island on the eve of Harry's 11th birthday. Why an island? Because Manhattan is an island where the WTC Towers were located.

Hagrid shows up on Tuesday, Harry's 11th birthday (alluding to the 11th of September in 2001 which was a Tuesday) and he smashes into the wooden door and knocks it down. When he comes inside he picks up the heavy massive door and props it back up. Later he knocks the same door down again to allude to the second WTC tower being knocked down.

see for yourself, if you must:

A visit from Rubeus Hagrid | Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXvlqsSeJ7Q

Here is the second time he knocks the door down for the destruction of the second tower.
https://ok.ru/video/1165334809284?fromTime=1073

Hagrid delivers the letter to Harry:

"Dear Mr. Potter, We are pleased to inform you that you have been accepted at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Please find enclosed a list of all necessary books and equipment. Term begins on September 1."

Right after Hagrid knocks down the door, a euphemism for the World Trade Center Tower, September 1 is mentioned, because as I said, this is the birthday of Mohamed Atta, the supposed ringleader of 9/11 and the supposed lead pilot who purportedly piloted (so they lie and tell us) the first plane, Flight 11 into the North Tower.

When Harry decides to leave the island with Hagrid and begin the journey of going off to a school of Witchcraft and Wizardry, he asks:

“How did you get here?” Harry asked, looking around for another boat. “Flew,” said Hagrid.

So you see, this Hagrid who knocks down the identical wooden door twice, to allude to the Twin Towers, is a euphemism for the airplanes striking the towers, because Hagrid says he "flew" to the island [of Manhattan].

The secret society deliberately arranged to publish the first four Potter novels prior to September 11, 2001, because each of the four books allude to each of the four separate attacks of 9/11.

So you see, the way one can know that the Harry Potter novels and films were the work of the secret society and not the lone work of some overly-imaginative soccer-mom, is because how could Rowling have known about the 9/11 attacks before hand and arranged the novels supposedly written in her name to allude to said attacks without being in on the conspiracy?

Once one familiarizes himself with the language, symbolism, numerology and allegories that the Illuminati employs, and spends many years and thousands of hours learning about hundreds of attacks and psy-ops as I have done, it is simply a matter of performing a careful analysis and investigation of the works published supposedly in the name of these authors, to find all the attacks hidden within them.

Why do you suppose that this cover I have attached to my post of the first novel, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone shows Harry Potter flying through the twin pillars? (i.e. the Twin Towers)

If one had read my multiple posts on the film Superman (1978), another Antichrist orphan, like Harry Potter, they would recognize that Superman flies Lois Lane right through the WTC Towers in NYC as well, and you would understand the allegory.

see this post of mine from September 27, 2018 for example showing Superman (a bird, a plane!) through the WTC Towers:

https://www.facebook.com/cyprian.crawford/posts/10216317128135849

The book Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, where Harry Potter is depicted flying through the twin pillars (Twin Towers) was published in the U.S. on the thirtieth birthday, 1 September 1998, of Mohamed Atta, the supposed lead hijacker and ringleader of the 19 mythological hijackers.

There were no Arabs/Muslims hijacking airplanes with boxcutters on 9/11. the story is a fabrication of the Jewish-Masonic Sanhedrin and the U.S. Government.

The third chapter of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone gives a hint as to what really happened with the planes and towers on 9/11:

"Dudley had already broken his new video camera, crashed his remote control airplane..."

There was no need for, and in fact there weren't any hijackers taking over planes with boxcutters, and piloting planes into the towers on 9/11. It is a fabricated story from the liars in the U.S. government and media. Planes (drones) were flown remotely into the World Trade Center towers.

You brought up the Rockefeller connection to the September 11, 2001 attacks and thew WTC Twin Towers. I have explained in previous posts a couple of years ago (see my July 10, 2017 post for example)...

https://www.facebook.com/cyprian.crawford/posts/10212779194209712

...how the Rockefeller brothers allude to the Twin Towers, when I made a series of posts explaining in detail how the Rocky films of Sylvester Stallone are all about ritually publishing the Illuminati's plans to groom and install George W. Bush as president and execute the 9/11 attacks after he took office.

They say that Sylvester Stallone was born on the exact same day and year as George W. Bush, July 6, 1946, and I have written many posts demonstrating how all of Sylvester Stallone's films are about the Rhinestone (1984) "Cowboy" President George W. Bush.

See my posts from July 2017 for the Rocky films. I've been investigating the September 11 attacks for 18 years now.

The secret society even arranged for Bush to have twins (girls) to allude to the twin towers they planned to destroy in his presidency.

Of course the Harry Potter novels/films feature the toweringly-tall Weasley twin brothers for the same reason, for the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11, ever since 2002 commemorated as Patriot Day, and for the twin bombings at the Boston Marathon on Patriots' Day, April 15, 2013.

Of course, Harry Potter's gal pal (the whore of Babylon) Hermione is played by actress Emma Watson, whose birthday is April 15, the date of the Boston Marathon bombings on Patriots' Day, also the arson fire of the cathedral of Notre Dame, and of course Emma born on 15 April in Paris, for the Notre Dame arson on 15 April 2019, Patriots' Day (third Monday in April), the anniversary of the Boston Marathon twin bombings on the third Monday of April, 15 April 2013.

I have also composed multiple posts over the years explaining how the cathedral of Notre Dame has a North and South Twin Towers, and how it is associated to the attacks of September 11, commemorated every years as "Patriot Day".

In these posts I explained that Maurice de Sully oversaw the construction of Notre Dame Cathedral and that he reportedly died on September 11, and that Victor Hugo's birthday is 26 February, the date the secret society carefully chose to perpetrate the first World Trade Center bombing of the North Tower in 1993.

Maurice de Sully
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_de_Sully

Victor Hugo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Hugo

Emma Watson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Watson

As I said, there are many attack plans of the secret society deliberately woven and cryptically embedded within the Harry Potter novels and films, not only the 9/11 attacks.

The Notre Dame arson was only a preview of their plans to destroy the Vatican.



His post:
https://www.facebook.com/cyprian.crawford/posts/10219198955779739

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"Harry Potter is marked in the forehead and cursed with the sign of Satan, a lightning bolt. He is obviously the young Antichrist. I take it that both Timothy and yourself are not real familiar with the novels or films, or you could easily recognize this."

I think the reviewer who made me not read the books mentioned it and I read it a few years ago.

Does it mean Rowling is an Illuminata? Or is she just Stan Leeing? You know as Stan Lee in Hellboy explores very damning predicaments of main persons (Hellboy is, if I recall what I read about it, also not one I read, son of Satan).

As we talk of "young Antichrist" you are aware that Nimrod was a first Antichrist after the Flood and young Nimrod was a fairly decent guy according to Josephus, he went wrong later.

Also, the Antichrist figure of the Rowling saga is Voldemort. Take away the T (the letter shaped as a cross) and write it in upper case, in ASCII it is 616. Without the T it also reminds closely of Valdemar, the Nordic form of Vladimir. Back in 1996, I don't think she was in a position to dread and consciously spoof Putin as yet.

"If Nicholas Flamel celebrated his 665th birthday last year, this is just a cryptic way of saying he is 666 this year."

Not very cryptic, and if Rowling is somewhat Christian (not rightbelieving, but has allegiances closer to Jesus than to Antichrist) she might simply have had an aversion to saying it directly.

Nicholas Flamel ... wait ... "celebrated" ... funny. While 1996 is actually 666 years after he was born, I don't think dead men usually celebrate their birthdays. He also died in March 22, 1412. Ah, he acquired a reputation of the contrary:

// Nicolas Flamel (c. 1330 – 22 March 1418)[1] was a French scribe and manuscript-seller. After his death, Flamel developed a reputation as an alchemist believed to have discovered the philosopher's stone and to have thereby achieved immortality. These legendary accounts first appeared in the 17th century. //

Nicolas Flamel - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Flamel

Obviously, the premiss of the book is built around the premiss he did achieve immortality (and was able to celebrate birthdays up to at least 1995). The other possible reason is, a 666th birthday party could have been missing as those words were said, since he was missing ... I don't know the plot of the book.

And obviously, the known facts of when he was born and what reputation he got 200 years or more after he died would have in 1996, when Rowling wrote the book added up to "he's 666 years old this year". Definitely one thing which could have inspired the book.

And that might be one reason for the badness of the books, I am not saying Rowling is morally good as writer.

"The committee of occultists that actually wrote this series of books have purposefully woven all sorts of hidden and cryptic occult references, and a lengthy and thorough examination would be necessary to demonstrate that some simple-minded divorced soccer mom did not come up with this book series and supposedly become richer than the Queen of England all by her lonesome."

The reference to Nicholas Flamel is accessible to anyone who has the curiosity to look it up.

That the references are occult is obviously part and parcel of the setting. That she chose such a setting doesn't mean she is an occultist.

And committees are not good at writing books, even divorced soccer-moms are better at that, since individual artists. That she is "simple minded" is not born out by the book she produced.

It seems to me, a certain type of proletarians who are Christians take having a culture that is not specifically Christian and which is also not commonplace proletarian as a sign of being in a conspiracy. Well, to a certain degree culture is a conspiracy, if you like, but not the kind of conspiracy you think of.

And yes, I think this cultural inferiority syndrome can persist in people who have been to seminary and who are priests. Alas, Pope Michael is somewhat of a case, though not the bitterest one, but then, the first Pope was a fisherman. Christ's choice is not always a compliment to culture.

"All the occult practices condemned by the Church have purposefully been woven into and promoted in these books by a committee of writers steeped in the occult."

Very probably by a lax half and half Christian who doesn't believe they work anyway ... so the Church of England she belonged to and Church of Scotland she belongs to do not take those bans seriously. THEN their presence is dictated by the setting.

If promotion it was - and I think it has been so with quite a few, very much more than on the part of books like Narnia or LotR - I don't think she planned it. Even less that someone else planned it, wrote the books and used her as a front. And even less than that that a committee wrote the books or any other novel. Beyond two or three equals, or one major writer outsourcing certain scenes, committee writing doesn't work. Two or three equals, I am thinking of how Goscinny and Uderzo both contributed to Astérix albums or Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. One main writer plus outsourcing certain scenes to someone specialising in it (like Hergé outsourced drawing of cars, or that could be a mismemory), that is the case for Alexandre Dumas the Elder. But ten people discussing a novel and succeeding in writing it, I don't believe that ever worked.

Case in point : Rob Skiba planned a kind of TV series, Seed, and planned on doing it along with a committee. That was quite a few years ago. I still haven't seen Seed, beyond his description of first chapter. Perhaps he was too much into sounding interest and didn't get enough repsonse, or - my hunch - the committee couldn't write a scenario together.

Plus, the charge is too much of an echo of a very clearly false charge against Tolkien. According to the "testimony" of John Todd (given the year when Tolkien was dying and next, and an Atlantic between them and also not in societies prone to contact Tolkien about what was being said, so JRR had no chance to answer), Occultists had been hiding the very occult rune alphabet from the public for centuries, basically since Nordic Paganism was outlawed in Scandinavia, probably, and then they authorised, in 1937, Tolkien to use runes in The Hobbit. In reality, anyone who is into language and Middle Ages of either Scandinavia or England has to come across runes, just like those interested in Byzantium have to come across the Greek alphabet and minuscules of the type used in 13th C. The Occultists had no power to forbid anyone to either study or artistically use runes, so no one needed their permission in 1937.

"As one can see, in this Simpsons episode from 2011, they are practically openly admitting what I said publicly years before, that J.K. Rowling is a merely front-author for the secret society ..."

More like spoofing the accusation with the ridicule it deserves. This argument is, per se, two edged : any thing the Secret Societies do can be spoofed with ridicule so one doesn't believe it (real case : Darwinists conspiring to silence Creationism spoof Creationist accusations of conspiracy into a conspiracy by believing Creationists who pose as Darwinists, a spoof which has gained in prevalence over the the time I have been debating the subject, since 2001). And on the other hand, any bona fide spoof of a ridiculous theory can be construed as an "admission" with the qualifier "practically". But in this case, my knowledge of writing in general leads me to say, no, committees don't write novels. Sometimes committees order novels that have to include certain ingredients, but there is one, two or three people actually writing them. Case in point : Simpsons are created by Matt Groening, developed by James L. Brooks, said Matt Groening and Sam Simon. AND they are not a serialised novel, they are a succession of "short stories" spanning one to three episodes.

"preparing to enthrone Antichrist"

Why, if so, does nothing in the novels imply Harry Potter is enthroned? Or does it?

"and yes Tolkien and Lewis were also front-authors for this same secret society, and their works also promote magic and wizardry and pagan practices and heresies condemned by the Church."

No. The John Todd accusation came when CSL had been dead for 10 years and JRRT was dying.

Parts of it are ridiculous, like the aforementioned allegation JRRT needed Occultists' permission to use runes, and parts of it are based on misconstruction of who are the bad and the good guys. Or good and bad things, as Tolkien is absolutely not promoting Frodo's using the ring. AND other parts are based on misconstruing nature of actors (an angelic being using angelic powers is obviously not the same as a human getting a lease on using such by a compact with Fallen angels).

"I can assure you, the secret society which has long been preparing and laying the groundwork to enthrone the Antichrist has thoroughly controlled the mainstream book publishing industry long before Tolkien and Lewis were even born."

There are different types of control, but making committees of occultists and using authors as mere names wouldn't work. Using only authors who agree to writing on the command of the secret societies would partly work, but as England had whistleblowers like Chesterton, not too much.

You are also missing that "mainstream book publishing industry" as we think of it today is actually younger than the death of Lewis and about contemporary to the death of Tolkien. Before that there were more and smaller publishing companies, therefore more independence overall and that means also more chances of independence from any given Secret Society.

Long list of coïncidences + "The secret society deliberately arranged to publish the first four Potter novels prior to September 11, 2001, because each of the four books allude to each of the four separate attacks of 9/11."

Easier explanation : whoever planned 911 was also planning on demonising pop culture. Deliberately copying fiction already published is one way, and the more known, the more effective. Secret Societies could have such goals. One which very clearly would have it is Islamic Brotherhood, as Islamism is very much about painting the West as extremely decadent.

"So you see, the way one can know that the Harry Potter novels and films were the work of the secret society and not the lone work of some overly-imaginative soccer-mom, is because how could Rowling have known about the 9/11 attacks before hand and arranged the novels supposedly written in her name to allude to said attacks without being in on the conspiracy?"

Easy, the conspirers could have known her work after it was published.

"Of course, Harry Potter's gal pal (the whore of Babylon) Hermione is played by actress Emma Watson, whose birthday is April 15, the date of the Boston Marathon bombings on Patriots' Day, also the arson fire of the cathedral of Notre Dame, and of course Emma born on 15 April in Paris, for the Notre Dame arson on 15 April 2019, Patriots' Day (third Monday in April), the anniversary of the Boston Marathon twin bombings on the third Monday of April, 15 April 2013."

Two possibilities again : when Emma Watson was cast, they were planning Notre Dame arson (even if true, doesn't really mean Rowling was involved in planning it or aware of this aspect of casting Emma), but other possibility, Notre Dame arson if arson was done on April 15th in order to allude to her.

Baiting people like you to get off the hook about just one of the possibilities.

With Notre Dame, accident is not excluded. Whether accident or arson, I have another theory on why God allowed it to happen 2019 and 15 April. 2019 is 33 years after 1986. April 13th would have been exact anniversary of Antipope Wojtyla stepping criminally into a synagogue. It was a Saturday, then came Sunday, the fire was on Monday.

On Good Friday, the Vatican II sect was not allowed to use purple or scarlet in Notre Dame, and Notre Dame itself was black, as is usual on Good Friday, since the Church is born as a widow.

The Book Job:

// Freelance writer Dan Vebber, who is known for his work on the animated series Futurama, wrote "The Book Job" with contributions from the staff writers on The Simpsons.[1][2] Matt Selman, an executive producer and writer on The Simpsons, was the one who conceived of the idea behind the episode. He was inspired by an article in The New Yorker about the book packaging company Alloy Entertainment—the publisher of series such as Gossip Girl and Vampire Diaries—and the company's use of ghostwriters. According to Selman, the article "was all about how these executives take market research and come up with the ideas for these books and farms them out and slaps the name of fake writers on them and fabricates backgrounds for these authors who don’t exist. We took that trend and kind of blew it up and shoved it in the face of Lisa".[1] //

The Book Job - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_Job

Obviously, even so Alloy Entertainment uses one author, named or ghost for each plot and obviously the practise is very low brow, as Alloy Entertainment itself.

When people are pushed away from Tolkien, Lewis, even Rowling because they are supposedly ghost writers of the Conspiracy, guess where novel hungry teens get their novels? Well, places like Alloy Entertainment.

Your idea "so and so can't have written" reminds me of the idea of Connelly:

What put the seal on Donnelly’s extravagant ideas as far as most people were concerned, however, was the publication of a series of books in which Donnelly explained how Shakespeare’s plays were really written by Francis Bacon, and that the texts conveyed occult messages from Bacon to his disciples in the future. These were The Shakespeare Myth (1887), The Great Cryptogram: Francis Bacon’s Cipher in Shakespeare’s Plays (1888), and The Cipher in the Plays, and on the Tombstone (1899).

The Just Third Way : The Weird World of Ignatius Loyola Donnelly
https://just3rdway.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-weird-world-of-ignatius-loyola.html

Obviously Shakespear could write the works of Shakespear, because he did.

Authorship questions are decided, mainly, by tradition from earliest days a work is mentioned. Otherwise you open the door to the guys who want the Gospellers to be front writers or fictions as front for Calpur[n]ius Piso (yes, that theory exists, alas).

Craig Crawford answered twice

leading to two threads, which I shall here call A and B.

A

Craig Crawford

"I don't think she was in a position to dread and consciously spoof Putin as yet."

I have also noted the Voldemort / Vladimir connection (same consonants VLDMR in the same order), and Putin was groomed by the secret society from his birth for his future role as president of the Russian Federation. So was Donald Trump. There are many films and tell-a-vision shows showing their plans to groom Putin and Trump going back more than 50 years. Likewise for your apostate popes. I have written about several of them here on my FB, and could fritter away many more hours writing about more.

In the Orthodox Church, St. Donald and St. Vladimir are celebrated on the exact same day, July 28 (N.S.) / July 15 (O.S.). July 28 is the reported birthday of Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, the actor who is supposedly the leader of the Islamic State.

None of this is by accident, but it has all been arranged by the Jewish-Masonic secret society which Donald and Vladimir serve. This self-same secret society has installed every pope in your lifetime as well. The Da Vinci Code series of books and films are all about Benedict XVI and Francis, by the way.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

This is perhaps more to the point than the ideas about books being written by committees.

Vladimir in Scandinavian languages is Valdemar, and Voldemor would sound like a dialectal (perhaps Smaalandian) "mispronunciation" of Valdemar.

I noted this to a few Danes visiting Paris - who were not Christian - in connexion with noting VOLDEMOR in ASCII adds up to 616.

VOLDEMORT is 700, the T is a letter like a Cross in some ductuses of writing it, and it is 84 in ASCII.

700 - 84 = 616.

One 616 in Upper Case apart from VOLDEMOR is IULJANOV. Like, Iljitj Uljanov, giving the Swedish transscription of his name.

However, 666 seems to be the correct value. For the final Antichrist. And this would mean Tolkien is better at describing Antichrist than Rowling is, since Sauron would in Welsh be spelled Sawron and in lower case only "sawron" gives 666 (474 + 6*32, each lower case being 32 more than the upper case).

It is odd that Rowling, after I met those Danes, tweeted (a few months later or next year) that in Voldemort, the final t is not pronounced.

This is perhaps better evidence of some kind of collusion with some kind of network, not necessarily one which in her presence would plan flying airplanes into buildings.

"This self-same secret society has installed every pope in your lifetime as well."

Wait, all three versions of Gregory XVII as well? Palmar de Troya as well? Pope Michael and Cardinal Siri as well?

You perhaps mean the Antipope series Paul VI, JP-1, JP-2, B-16, F1?

Perhaps JP-1 wasn't and was killed when they saw they had made a slip in allowing him in.

"The Da Vinci Code series of books and films are all about Benedict XVI and Francis, by the way."

If you mean Herringrose cardinal is based on Ratzinger and the cardinal getting elected at Angels and Demons being a wishlist for the election which gave Bergoglio, I'd agree.

Not necessarily that Dan Brown knew Bergoglio, it could just be lots of "team Bergoglio" were Dan Brown fans. Secretly, since officially since at least B16, Catholics are discouraged from reading Dan Brown, though there is no more any Index to put his books on.

Angels and Demons show DB sympathising with at least a humane (presumedly original) version of Illuminati, and the novel could be the real hint much of conspiracy theories are based on.

If Illuminati have the mission to revenge Idolatrous Pagans and Scientist and Muslims on Catholics, in retribution for Crusades and Inquisition (misportrayed), no need for them to have a continuous existence, unlike the Church which must guard a heritage of truth, they can very well be a mystery of iniquity which at one time was, then was no more and now is or soon will be again.

I consider DB was saying "get us a Pope the nice Illuminati can respect, so there won't be any Illuminati unworthy baddies like the Hashisheen".

Speaking of "groomed for" I think I have been deliberately kept out of circulation in larger mediatic rooms precisely by people trying to groom me for sth else than I was writing.

I did not know Vladimir and Donald being same calendar day. I am not quite surprised. If CIA planted Putin as a "decent" (in their view) KGB agent and then KGB contributed to Trump, I'd not be very surprised.

Whether Trump is a KGB agent or he is really a salesman, and security services wanted a salesman's complent in ruling the world.

I am not fan of either. I'd have preferred Marco Rubio or Rick Santorum.

B

Craig Crawford

Hans-Georg, the committee of occult writers oriented the theme to the first Harry Potter book around Nicolas Flamel, for multiple reasons.

For one thing, I was under the impression that you were living in France, and as you are probably well aware, Nicholas Flamel is mentioned many times in Victor Hugo's The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1831). Rue Nicolas Flamel and Saint-Jacques Tower are only approx. 500-600 meters from Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris.

see for yourself:
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Saint-Jacques+Tower,+Square+de+la+Tour+Saint-Jacques,+75004+Paris,+France/Cath%C3%A9drale+Notre-Dame+de+Paris,+6+Parvis+Notre-Dame+-+Pl.+Jean-Paul+II,+75004+Paris,+France/@48.8555183,2.3471071,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x47e66e1e5e72161b:0xe085e8b2d3c0632e!2m2!1d2.3489072!2d48.8580685!1m5!1m1!1s0x47e671e19ff53a01:0x36401da7abfa068d!2m2!1d2.3499021!2d48.8529682!3e2

Victor Hugo's novel even makes reference to the philosopher's stone possibly being located inside Notre Dame:

Victor Hugo's The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1831):

"But, what every one might have noticed was the interminable hours which he [Archdeacon of Notre Dame Claude Frollo] often employed, seated upon the parapet of the area in front of the church, in contemplating the sculptures of the front; examining now the foolish virgins with their lamps reversed, now the wise virgins with their lamps upright; again, calculating the angle of vision of that raven which belongs to the left front, and which is looking at a mysterious point inside the church, where is concealed the philosopher’s stone, if it be not in the cellar of Nicolas Flamel."

Flamel means 'flame,' in Old French; hence the figure of Nicolas Flamel in Harry Potter was chosen to allude not only to the secret society's intentions to perpetrate the Notre Dame arson fire, but also to the destruction of St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, which stood adjacent to the South Tower at the World Trade Center site.

St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Nicholas_Greek_Orthodox_Church

As I said, there are countless attacks hidden in all the Harry Potter novels and films, including 9/11, the multiple Paris attacks, and I even today wrote about the current flooding in Texas in Harris County ("Harry's county," i.e. for Harry Potter, who is Prince Harry) in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007).

The mason and heretic Archbishop Demetrios of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America (he recently retired) said this:

“Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox National Shrine, although destroyed in the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 is now, with the grace of God, being resurrected at the new World Trade Center and it will soon rise like a glorious phoenix as a National Shrine and a place of pilgrimage for our Nation. It will be a place of faith, a place of peace and a place of solace and hope,” Archbishop Demetrios of America has commented on the church’s reconstruction in the heart of New York’s financial district.

In the second Potter book, it is revealed that "I am Lord Voldemort" is an anagram of the character's birth name, "Tom Marvolo Riddle."

Obviously the name Tom Riddle means "Twin Riddle" since the name Tom/Thomas means 'twin'.

The "Twin Riddle" is alluding to the Twin Towers connection between the WTC Twin Towers (North and South) and the twin towers (North and South) of the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris.

The twin riddle of Nicolas Flamel and his Philosopher Stone (suggested to be concealed within the church of Notre Dame in Victor Hugo's novel) and the Church of St. Nicholas at the WTC in Manhattan, destroyed by the demolition and fiery debris of the South Tower falling on it.

There are of course other meanings as well.

As I said, the actress Emma Watson who plays Hermione, was born in Paris on April 15, and they deliberately chose her (even though hundreds or even thousands of young girls would have been thrilled to play the role), with the knowledge that they intended to light the spire and roof of Notre Dame on fire on her birthday 15 April 2019, in the city Paris where she was born.

Hermione is the character in the first novel/film who goes to the library and first learns about Nicolas Flamel in a book.

By the way, yesterday, 19 September, is said to be Hermione Granger's birthday in the Potter series.

Hermione was the daughter of King Menelaus of Sparta and his wife, Helen of Troy.

I have written previously of how Helen of Troy was considered the most beautiful woman in the world, and of her abduction by Paris, Prince of Troy, which brought about the Trojan War.

Christopher Marlowe's tragedy Doctor Faustus (1604) says of Helen of Troy:

"Was this the face that launch'd a thousand ships / And burnt the topless towers of Ilium?"

Christopher Marlowe was said to be baptized on 26 February, which is also the reported birthday of Victor Hugo.

As I have mentioned many times, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was scheduled by the secret society and the U.S. authorities (FBI, etc.) for 26 February to tie into the birthday of Victor Hugo and the baptism of Christopher Marlowe.

1993 World Trade Center bombing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing

Of course 26.2 (26 February) also ties into the 26.2 miles of a marathon, and the bombing of the WTC Twin Towers to the twin bombings at the Boston Marathon.

George W. Bush signed a law making every September 11th Patriot Day.

Patriot Day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Day

The Boston Marathon bombings were scheduled for Patriots' Day, April 15, 2013 (third Monday in April), as well as the Virginia Tech fake shooting psy-op was also scheduled for Patriots' Day, April 16, 2007 (third Monday in April), in honor of the father and forerunner of Antichrist, Pope Benedict XVI, on his 80th birthday.
Patriots' Day
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriots'_Day

Virginia Tech shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_shooting

Of course, the "actor" who played the Virginia Tech fake shooter was named Cho, and they say his birthday is January 18.

Seung-Hui Cho
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seung-Hui_Cho
That is why the Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) film screenplay was written by Michael Goldenberg, who shares the same birthday 18 January, as the supposed Virginia Tech shooter.

Michael Goldenberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Goldenberg

That is why the character Cho Chang in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) film is portrayed as a traitor, a "Benedict Arnold," to allude to the fake shooting staged on Pope Benedict [Arnold's] 80th birthday, April 16, 2007, and the (supposed) shooter Cho.

Cho Chang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbledore%27s_Army#Cho_Chang

Of course they timed the hype for the release of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) to coincide with the fake shooting psy-op. They wrapped up filming months before, of course, in 2006.

Hiereus Anaxios [tagged]

Hans-Georg Lundahl

I am very well aware of rue Nicolas Flamel and close on rue Pernelle - the name of his wife, having St. Petronilla (daughter of Simon Peter, I think) as patron.

I am therefore also very well aware that he is a historic figure. This means, he could easily have been known to la Rowling independently of any conspirators, and while wikipedia was perhaps not yet a thing in 1996, when the book was written, checking, no it is from 2001, internet forums arguably already were. Plus, if she was fascinated by witchcraft since childhood, she would arguably have made some at least superficial researches into the occult and known it from there, even from books she sought out.

This means, while she had the main characters from the train journey (yes, inspiration works that way), she would have made more researches into the occult after the train journey, on the way to completing the manuscript.

As said, societies like that could easily get inspiration for their deeds from an already published book.

Whether or not Notre Dame fire was planned long in advance, it came on a double year count, if not exact anniversary : 72 years, perhaps not on the day, or 71, after Cardinal Suhard applied for wider authorisations into believing Darwinism (a bit like bishops under Commie régimes would be doing in 70's, for similar reasons), and 33 years and third day after the visit JP-2 made to the Synagogue of Rome.

If they didn't plan all including the 1947 or 1948 plan to subvert Moses in Catholic teaching, God used their plans or an accident, whichever it was, to say what He thought about Darwinism as well as about Synagogue visit (also strategically 13 days before Chernobyl, the difference these two centuries between Gregorian and Julian, so Chernobyl came on same date in a different calendar).

If no secret societies planned Chernobyl and Notre Dame disasters, we have God's judgements. If not, God is telling us to look for secret societies a bit better.

But a committe writing a novel is a way where I won't look. A committee asking an author for a novel, giving a wishlist of things to include, commenting as it is written "no, do it like that instead" - well, possible, but would be harassing for an author in such a position.

But no, authors are in fact needed to write things with a given not just cumulative unity. One, two or three, like One God in Three Persons creating the Universe.

Collections of short stories (like Simpsons), or wikis, or Chronicles where the unity of event comes from God's providence, yes, but not novels.

Speaking of St Nicholas, how do things stand now as to rebuilding of St Nicholas and Ground Zero Mosque?

Both denied? Both granted? One but not other?

"As I have mentioned many times, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was scheduled by the secret society and the U.S. authorities (FBI, etc.) for 26 February to tie into the birthday of Victor Hugo and the baptism of Christopher Marlowe."

Thanks for not saying Victor Hugo and Christopher Marlowe being chosen as front authors for having birth or baptismal days already planned in advance for 1993!

AND for saying such networks can plagiarise on items of interest which they did not produce. My point about coincidences not necessarily meaning the author was involved in planning the misdeed.

As to Emma Watson, some kind of Masonic network is somewhat involved in her carreer.

After Hermione Granger, she has featured in a film by Alejandro Amenábar, the guy who let Rachel Weisz play Hypatia in a totally unhistoric Agora.

Craig Crawford

No disrespect intended, but I am not interested in wasting precious time attempting to convince folks of realities which they are neither prepared nor willing to accept. You and others are free to believe as you wish, but I hope you understand that my purpose here is not to engage in endless debate with those who are unwilling to receive the truth. It is apparent that you really do not know all that much about Hollywood, the book publishing industry, the political sphere, and how the secret societies make use of these propaganda arms, which would be fine if you had the humility to learn from others who do know a bit about these things.

You and I have radically different worldviews, so it is not possible for our conversations to bear much in the way of fruit. You regard me as being in delusion for not recognizing papal pretensions to supremacy and infallibility, and the Orthodox saints tell us that the pope is the forerunner of Antichrist and the idol of Catholics, who are idolaters.

Rick Santorum and Marco Rubio are fanatical and rabid Zionists and Judaizers: preachers of Antichrist. They are merely agents representing the interests of global Jewry and Zionism, which are intensely preparing to enthrone the false Christ.

Forgive me, and I'm sorry to say, but that you would 'prefer' Rubio or Santorum over Trump testifies to your naïveté and ignorance with regards to the sphere of politics and the signs of the times. It reveals that you still have faith in the antichrist "democratic" or "republican" systems, which are thoroughly demonized and have been completely in the hands of the Masons since well before you and I were born.

France is not a Christian nation; rather it is a de-Christianized atheist state.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"the book publishing industry"

I do know enough to know when it changed.

I know enough to know Methuen who published several of CSL's works prior to Narnia was a fairly small publisher, whose owners had no "wiki-visible" ties to Freemasonry. AND this started c. 20-30 years before the change in US book industry.

"and how the secret societies make use of these propaganda arms,"

It's not a question of not knowing they do so, it's a question of knowing some ways in which they do not do so.

"which would be fine if you had the humility to learn from others who do know a bit about these things."

Is your knowledge derived from the false witness of John Todd?

"You regard me as being in delusion for not recognizing papal pretensions"

No, I regard you as being in error for it. Delusion is something other than error.

"[T]he Orthodox saints tell us that the pope is the forerunner of Antichrist and the idol of Catholics, who are idolaters."

We do not any more idolise Popes than you idolise your Bishops or your Starets.

Since when are there Orthodox saints doing so?

Photius? Palamas? Mark of Ephesus? Later and indebted to Protestant fanatics. I'd say. I guess. But if you can find a passage in Mark of Ephesus saying so, or in Palamas even ... fine, show me. Then you were not copying the Protestant error, but they were copying yours.

This is also quite a bit outside the discussion at hand, namely whether one should, basically, trust John Todd's word or not.

Or, whether Tolkien promoted men learning magic arts.

It's not just in Silmarillion, it's already in appendices, Appendix B, skip all of Second Age and where it says Third Age it's second and third paragraph saying the Istari were sent from the West and they took human appearance. For mortals, real mortals, using magic, Tolkien's examples are The Witch-King of Angmar, fullblown demonic, not a role model, Gollum, Bilbo and Frodo, corrupted in diverse measures by use and even possession of the ring, so, also, not rolemodels.

If you think of Gandalf before the gate of Moria as using spells, I think it can be considered passwords. You use a password when you log in to an account, and in some houses, to get to your appartment, you go through a common entry hall, which has a door opening for one specific code.

There is no human learning magic in Tolkien. Those there are in Narniad are :

• Uncle Andrew (evil, not a role model)
• Prince Caspian learning only the theory (the practical part is not a study for princes)
• Professor Cornelius (half dwarf, half Telmarine), his tutor, and we don't see him using any magic powers beyond putting guards to sleep (drug or - if familiar with the guards - hypnosis would do)
• Lucy who under a death-threat takes on the duty to pronounce one spell and is reprehended severely for pronouncing another one first.

This is not how one promotes magic.

Harry Potter does, that is why I am not reading it, and Isaac Asimov portrays science and technology as a kind of magic, and I am allergic to him too.

I have been harrassed by the kind of network you study over their ambition to groom me for a future task. If in 2010 I had shouted out "oh, Isaac Asimov is so much better than Tolkien" I might already have been a rich man. Not indeed having just my name used for novels actually written by committees, writing doesn't work like that, and when Rob Skiba thought he did, he seems to have been deceived, since his Seed is still not available. But probably working out plans committees presented and getting my working out of them criticised in detail and modified over and over again by committees.

That would work, and I think Isaac Asimov and his circle were indeed functioning like that, unlike the Inklings.

Instead I wrote on my blog "I love Tolkien and I hate Isaac Asimov", and I am still poor. People like you who have pretended me a dupe or even willing tool of networks and at least if neither of these my work unusable for anything good as long as I don't agree with you on where the Orthodox Church is, and as long as I don't agree with you on how Illuminati work, you have contributed to their goal of marginalising me.

If you liked, we could have a discussion on how exactly Dan Brown is really serving them. Not as a front for a committee of authors, but probably an author subservient to a committee, and certainly sharing much of their world view - as does Rowling, perhaps rather less than Dan Brown.

I have even asked myself if the "tribe of Dan" which does not go to Heaven (or has no gate in Heaven, at least) could in these end times refer to Dan Brown fans.

If that is what you call being a dupe of modern media, you have ceased to attribute to words their usual meaning. Which would be a by product of learning Illuminati speak, as it is not a foreign language, but a break down of normal language use.

"Rick Santorum and Marco Rubio are fanatical and rabid Zionists and Judaizers: preachers of Antichrist."

Did not know.

"They are merely agents representing the interests of global Jewry and Zionism, which are intensely preparing to enthrone the false Christ."

Does not follow.

"It reveals that you still have faith in the antichrist "democratic" or "republican" systems, which are thoroughly demonized and have been completely in the hands of the Masons since well before you and I were born."

I most certainly do not.

I share the Chesterton aversion to The Party System.

"France is not a Christian nation; rather it is a de-Christianized atheist state."

There is some Christian nation left, but the state is mainly as you describe it.

So is Sweden, with much less of a Christian nation left.

Two additions:

On Asimov, I seem to have misrecalled (or the article has been changed, but I recall parts of it as it stands now) the function of the society:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_Door_Spiders

On Santorum and Rubio being Zionists, would that be simply because they are anti-Islamic?

We may see as time gets on, if he answers any more./HGL