FB censure contre la vérité / pardons, censurait

J'ai voulu partager ce contenu avec un ami nordique :

På Svenska og på Dansk på Antimodernism : Tyska National-Socialister intet alltid de värsta
https://danskantimodernism.blogspot.com/2026/06/tyska-national-socialister-intet-alltid.html

Le lien a été supprimé, voici la règle appliquée :

Personnes et organisations dangereuses

Nous n’autorisons pas les personnes à partager ou à envoyer des symboles, des signes de glorification ou du soutien à des personnes et des organisations que nous définissons comme dangereuses.

Exemples d’interdictions

Glorification d’une attaque terroriste

Encourager la violence envers un groupe spécifique de personnes

Soutenir ou faire la promotion d’activités criminelles comme la traite d’êtres humains

La seule glorification dans l'article est à Paulina Forslund, une national-socialiste assumée, et, surtout, une mère de neuf. J'ai porté dans les PS un regard bienveillant mais critique sur ses constats de la réalité suédoise, l'interview étant par des nationalistes tchèques.

Elle a notamment dit que des couples de blanches avec immigrés racisés sont dûs à la propagande de mélange de races. J'ai répliqué qu'ils sont surtout dûs au fait que les immigrés reçoivent et les Suédois de souche se voient presque interdit une éducation assumée masculine.

Le bloc de l'article était sur un acte terroriste commis contre des Allemands des Sudètes, et comment le National-Socialisme Tchèque a, dans ce cas, commis une pire chose que les National-Socialistes Allemands dans le moment et l'endroit. Je pense que le massacre de Postelberg était, effectivement, un acte terroriste.

Je n'ai ni encouragé des attaques contre des Tchèques, ni contre des Allemands./HGL

PS, restauré sept minutes après ma demande d'examen. C'est plus vite qu'avant.

Merci!/HGL

Some FB Admins Hate Chesterton

I regularly share Chesterton quotes on FB.

Both my accounts have now been de facto blocked from access.

At least the Georges Pompidou library right now.

The one which has a composition of mine as profile picture was blocked in another library too and has been that for some days.

Hans-Georg Lundahl
https://www.facebook.com/hansgeorglundahl/

But the same is also the case with the other account:

Hans-Georg Lundahl
https://www.facebook.com/hglundahl/

From Rivarol I know that Islamist leaning Muslims are doing the Admins on FB France. I also know an Englishman or US American FB Friend, who is not among my most intimate, got a birthday present, a link to a post of mine, which he may not have appreciated. But even if he "sounded the alarm bell" he could not do anothing himself, it would have to go through Admins of FB or of the internet connections (and that's less economic, it would be two libraries and one cyber)./HGL

PS, I find a QR code as a means of connecting myself:

Scannez le code QR et confirmez que les codes correspondent pour vous connecter.
KAG-ICR-HUFI

I do not have a cell phone, so I can't. I always use computers only for connection./HGL

PPS, fixed for one of them, right now [hglundahl]/HGL

PPPS, in case you wonder, less than two hours after I published this./HGL

PPPPS, still not fixed for the other [hansgeorglundahl]/HGL

Attempts on my FB access

This is the third time I get this kind of extra verification:

The first two times I filled in, I got returned to a normal FB login, and each time, as after the first login, I was thrust onto an extra verification.

It may be mentioned that FB France is managed by moderators who are Qataris, and that I've lately showed myself critical against Islam.*

The government continued to censor or ban print and social media religious material it considered objectionable. In June the government deported an Arabic-speaking evangelical Christian pastor after interrogating him for three days on charges of leading a place of worship without authorization and inviting non-Christians to his church. Conversion to another religion from Islam is defined by the law as apostasy and illegal, although there have been no recorded punishments for apostasy since the country’s independence in 1971

Source:

2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Qatar
US Department of State
https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-report-on-international-religious-freedom/qatar

It may also be mentioned, I contacted the son of Katarina Taikon, whose mother's autobiography i enjoyed, explaining why I, while supporting Gypsy Rights, am a Fascist and why that doesn't equal Nazi. It's possible that a certain campaign to stamp me as a Nazi or my Fascist alignment as a racist (including anti-gypsy) one is not very amused by this initiative on my part./HGL

PS, Fixed, but the guy didn't answer. I'm still a fan of his mother, though./HGL

PPS, if you didn't get it, it's the access that's fixed./HGL

* A certain Muslim attitude about polemics from non-Muslims, specifically against Islam is calling it "maligning" ... now the true religion is certainly in one sense maligned by any polemics against it, but this is not always due to an intent of misrepresenting. I think some Protestants have also pretended I maligned the Deformation, on their view "Reformation" ... by showing it is opposed to an implication of Matthew 28:20. Oh, I misrepresent the intention of the Reformers, Luther never intended to create a new church ... the problem is, they agree that the Church that eventually came out of Luther, namely Lutherans, and a few more, that came out of him indirectly, are new. And Matthew 28:20 requires for there to be a true Church that's from "AD 33" (exact year somewhat disputed), that's not a pure abstraction and that's still there. A Conclavist doesn't agree that the papacy of Vatican in Exile is a new papacy, we say it's the old papacy that got a fresh start after a 32 year long pause (a record long sedevacancy). We say that it's the popes currently in the Vatican who are very recent transformers comparable to the Deformers (one proposed year of limit being 1958). Again, a Vatican-II-ist may tactically pretend I'm "maligning" the Vatican because of my convictions about it ... but would be less eager to openly consider my intent as that of maligning./HGL

Facebook Connection Phishing For an Email?

HGL'S F.B. WRITINGS: Facebook Connection Phishing For an Email? · New blog on the kid: Phishing for an Email

It so happens, the password I entered for that FB account was correct.

Update, 27.I.2025, 22:20:

Again, the password was correct./HGL

Update, 1.II.2025:

Update 6.II.2025:

Zuckerberg Changed His Policy?

By 20 minutes 18 seconds in this video, I had heard it:

Singing From the Ruins | FORWARD BOLDLY
Christine Niles | 12.I.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkjWGRkFezI

I decided to test. Well, not to me:

What I tried to share, the first of these three (which link to each other), here:

Newer Tables: Preliminaries · Flood to Joseph in Egypt · Joseph in Egypt to Fall of Troy.

Where a tried to share:

Radiometric Dating
https://www.facebook.com/groups/201189381177748

The group is dedicated to a discussion between Deep Timers and Young Earth Creationists about diverse methods of Radiometric dating, one of which is carbon dating. My intended post was entirely appropriate for the group. No one has stamped my blogs as criminal in any court of law in France, at least none where I was able to answer or that I heard of. Facebook is treating my blogs as criminal, because they do not support the agenda of promoting Big Bang Cosmology, Deep Time Evolution, possibly also parts of what Roger Buck calls "Eastern, Esoteric, Ecumenic, English" which does take issue with Modern Science on lots of issues, but not on these ones./HGL

Censorship on FB, Again

Memory, 10 years ago, I shared two links:

Can I share the whole memory? See:

The two links I tried to share were:

Creation vs. Evolution: Natural Selection - Observations on an Issue among Creationists, and on Duty of Disclaimers in Diverse Issues
vendredi 28 novembre 2014 | Publié par Hans Georg Lundahl à 05:17
http://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2014/11/natural-selection-observations-on-issue.html

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica: Kurukshetra War and Joshua's Long Day
Sunday, November 30, 2014 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 11:50 AM
https://filolohika.blogspot.com/2014/11/kurukshetra-war-and-joshuas-long-day.html

It Could Be Over (I Hope)

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Documenting Censorship · HGL's F.B. writings: Censorship Again · It Could Be Over (I Hope)

The links were clickable. If everything's OK, Robert Sungenis got my joke and did his stuff, and I have got rid of a very burdensome censorship.

If this is the case, thanks! Or to someone else if someone else did it!
/Hans Georg Lundahl

PS: Here are the links, by the way:

somewhere else: Did the Gospellers plagiarise Mexican Myth, Acharya?
https://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.com/2012/10/did-gospellers-plagiarise-mexican-myth.html

somewhere else: So, Dionysus was a Copy of Moses, may One Presume?
https://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.com/2012/11/so-dionysus-was-copy-of-moses-may-one.html

Censorship Again

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Documenting Censorship · HGL's F.B. writings: Censorship Again · It Could Be Over (I Hope)

The link I tried to share was:

Creation vs. Evolution: What About Providentissimus Deus?
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2024/11/what-about-providentissimus-deus.html

So, has Robert Sungenis bribed French administrators of FB in order to keep me out of competition?

I was right now even prevented from simply commenting under a thing he had no problem sharing (or Levi J. Pingleton for him)./HGL

PS, it seems, according to my memory from reading Rivarol a few months ago, the French administrators of FB aren't so much French as Qataris./HGL

Really From FB? Or Someone Trying to Hack Me?

I don't know for sure, but look at this earlier one:

If the earlier one is also an attempt to hack, it speaks the same story : someone doesn't like what I say. If it's not, but really from FB, it means someone else doesn't like what I say./HGL

PS, here is my page, btw: Hans Lundahl
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063737091020

Here is a picture on it:

Is someone hateful of the suggestion that the geocentric and heliocentric systems cannot be totally distinguished by ocular evidence (though the most direct reading of it is geocentric)? Or that the universe could be small and the Distant Starlight Problem some allege against Recent Creationism is totally moot? Perhaps./HGL

Abusive Censorship Again

Creation vs. Evolution: Test if You Can Post a Link From Here on Facebook! · HGL'S F.B. WRITINGS: Abusive Censorship Again

Creation vs. Evolution: Neanderthal - speculations and certainty
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2018/07/neanderthal-speculations-and-certainty.html

Content unspecified, but also removed:

More:

Creation vs. Evolution : Durupınar Site is Geographically Possible, but the Drogue Stones are a Bad Argument
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2024/01/durupnar-site-is-geographically.html

Concept of FB Abused as Contact Inhibition

I found someone was reacting with hearts to the links I shared about the Catholic Faith, and with tears to the links about abortion and the martyrdom of Lewis XVI and Marie Antoinette, so, I found it was arguably a kindred soul.

Here is what happened:

Can't Send Request
It looks like you may not know this person. Send requests to people you know personally to see their updates on Facebook.

This is highly abusive, since it stops FB from serving as a platform to gain contacts for those having none or highly inadequate ones around them./HGL

The Concept of Spam is Abused as Reason for Arbitrary Censorship

On June 18th, back in 2019, I wrote this article, and then shared it on FB, probably giving the link as a birthday present, same or one of the following days:

Creation vs. Evolution : "Edessa in Mesopotamia"
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2019/06/edessa-in-mesopotamia.html

On December 1st, 2023, more than four full years later, some person on FB does this:

The allegation is, I tried to gain likes or video views or followers in a misleading way.

If literally the only thing I posted was the link itself, or perhaps before that the words "some reading? here:" — how can that be misleading ? I have stated nothing about the text except where it is to be found, leaving the reader entirely free to like or dislike it as he prefers, to share or not share it.

Obviously, someone, more properly someoneS, have found even that misleading. Their version of a truthful and honest Hans Georg Lundahl is a Hans Georg Lundahl who doesn't try to share what they don't want him to share. Or simply shares nothing at all, because they don't want me to be a writer.

Please note, the criminal offense against freedom of speech has been ongoing manually.

The links I posted are being eliminated one by one, therefore manually. And no, it's not the one having the wall eliminating my comment, FB itself is claiming "WE removed your comment."

A few months ago, I heard of FB France having a security team who were diehard Muslims (was it of the Qatari extraction, which has some influence in France? I don't recall).

Muslims have tried to put me into weakened positions or to admit not feeling very well or so, so they could eliminate freedoms for me in the guise of "helping" me, helping "poor" me ... meanwhile I am poor in another sense, namely if not directly broke at least deprived from income by their crimes.

But also by the treason of Christians who accuse me of being a Muslim or an agent provocateur or whatever.

Their main evidence for me being a pawn of possibly perverted élites is, I am getting help, juridically against direct captivity into psychiatry, policing against vandalism of my property, while I'm away, materially as to food and clothing items, pretty much from people close to the enforcers of law and order and therefore government and socio-economic élites. The reason I need this help in the first place is that such Christians, the most likely people to re-publish my blogs on paper, have drawn conclusions from a de facto protégé situation I did not chose. And therefore they have sided with the Muslim censors of FB against me.

I think some of the Muslims on FB, certainly some elsewhere, started months ago, soon a year. What happened? Muslims have lost children in Eastern Turkey, near Edessa in Mesopotamia here mentioned. Muslims have lost children in Morocco. Muslims have recently been losing children, are perhaps still losing children, through the inhuman agression on Gaza prior to the ceasefire.

For whereas they would not believe any thing before by reason of the enchantments, then first upon the destruction of the firstborn, they acknowledged the people to be of God.
Wisdom 18:13

But even in France, a very anticlerical country, Christians, specifically Catholic Christians, could have helped me. I could have been enjoying well deserved incomes from my writing, but the ones addicted to recent changes in discipline specifically on Biblical exegesis, among the Catholic population (not saying "in the Catholic Church"), have preferred to side with those Muslims, or even to egg them on to their ill deeds./HGL

PS, 10.XII.2023 (and I tried to appeal)

10 déc. 2023
Nous avons supprimé votre commentaire
Hans-Georg Lundahl
16 oct. 2018

Sth to read?
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2018/10/neanderthal-probably-innocent-of.html

Vous avez partagé ce contenu sur votre profil

Votre commentaire va à l’encontre de nos Standards de la communauté sur le spam.

Än mer Censur

På Stephan Borgehammars mur.

Innehåller en reference till hans verk. Är på tyska:

Antworten nach Sorte : Reliquien, echt!
https://antw-n-sorte.blogspot.com/2019/11/reliquien-echt.html

Mehr Censur

Schlechte Nachricht:

Nach dem was am Wand fehlte:

Antworten nach Sorte : Stefan Speck machte einen Bock in der Nordischen Sprachwissenschaft
https://antw-n-sorte.blogspot.com/2023/09/stefan-speck-machte-einen-bock-in-der.html

Even More?

FB "Removing Spam" From Back in 2019! · Even More? · Quora Too?

This time, after taking the screenshot, I got no chance of appealing, the pop-up window was gone after I finished making the image, and it wasn't coming back, however, I can refer to the post that I shared on - very obviously - a relevant group.

Creation vs. Evolution : Ambiguous Sentence Found
Wednesday 23 Octobre 2019, Hans Georg Lundahl
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2019/10/ambiguous-sentence-found.html

Is it because FB only showed the pop-up once, or is it because some admin on the cyber clicked the button I didn't intend to click?/HGL

PS, it is not the same that was turned down after review, I checked./HGL

PPS, here is another item:

PPPS - and another:

It gives a link, purportedly to taking measures of proving the account is mine, I'll copy the link and log out of both blog and FB before using it, and see if it is anywhere like legit, or a hacker./HGL

PPPPS - seems it was a hacker, here is where the link led to:

PPPPPS - the account seems to either belong to a hacker or have been hacked, I think the latter:

after lots of scrolling:

Every post after these two was identic, and all of them were from c. 24 h. ago. Too many not to have been automated./HGL

FB "Removing Spam" From Back in 2019!

FB "Removing Spam" From Back in 2019! · Even More? · Quora Too?

I gave an offer that exists, namely of republishing my blog posts in commercial form. The URL's did not redirect. I did not request anyone to interact with the link by sharing or liking prior to accessing it. And so on for all the rest of the rigmarole.

Here is the terms of my offer:

A little note on further use conditions:*
https://hglwrites.wordpress.com/a-little-note-on-further-use-conditions/

Here is a list of blogs to which it applies:

Creation vs. Evolution : Blogs by same author
http://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/p/blogs-by-same-author.html

These are the exact same links I shared back in 2015, 19th of July. It is not fraudulent that my offer is on the terms given in the first link, and it is not fraudulent that it applies directly to most of the blogs given in the second link. Both propositions are the exact truth. Disputing the first is disputing my rights of authorship and creative property. Disputing the second is disputing the fact of my authorship and my work already done.

If the removal was automatic, it is because AI is incompetent to do juridics. If the removal was done manually, it is because the person held me in dislike or contempt.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Day after St. Bartholomew
25.VIII.2023

One More FB Stops Me From Sharing

Here is the link:

somewhere else : Notes on the Disputation of Barcelona - very preliminary
https://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.com/2023/03/notes-on-disputation-of-barcelona-very.html

Blocage même en messages privées

Il s'agit de ce lien:

Creation vs. Evolution : Are CMI Hearing Me?
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2022/11/are-cmi-hearing-me.html

Sur le logiciel de blocage, quelqu'un a rempli le fichier de configuration injustement avec mon blog dedans.

https://transparency.fb.com/fr-fr/policies/community-standards/?source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fcommunitystandards

Lorsque nous limitons la liberté d’expression, nous le faisons pour assurer le respect de l’une ou de plusieurs des valeurs suivantes :

Notons lesquels:

AUTHENTICITÉ
Nous voulons nous assurer que le contenu vu sur Facebook est authentique. Nous sommes convaincus que l’authenticité crée un meilleur environnement de partage, et nous ne voulons donc pas que les utilisateurs de Facebook mentent sur leur identité ou leurs activités.

J'ai ni menti sur mon identité, ni sur mon activité. Sauf une mention sur mon profil FB, qu'on n'a pas éliminé:

Par contre, ce blog qu'on bloque n'est pas en train de dire "Études : études libres sans inscription à Paul Cézanne University" (les autres mentions études sont authentiques).

CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Nous nous engageons à protéger votre vie privée et vos informations. La confidentialité donne la liberté nécessaire pour être soi-même, pour choisir quand et comment partager des informations sur Facebook et pour créer des liens plus facilement.

Ce blog n'est pas en train de divulguer les vies privées des autres utilisateurs.

SÉCURITÉ
Nous nous engageons à faire de Facebook un endroit sûr. Nous supprimons les contenus susceptibles de menacer la sécurité physique. Les formes d’expression menaçantes peuvent intimider les autres personnes, les exclure ou les réduire au silence, et ne sont donc pas autorisées sur Facebook.

Le blog menace personne quand à sa sécurité physique.

DIGNITÉ
Nous pensons que tout le monde mérite les mêmes droits et la même dignité. Nous attendons de chaque personne qu’elle respecte la dignité d’autrui, et qu’elle ne harcèle pas ni ne rabaisse pas les autres.

Et ne rabaisse personne.

Et sur les listes un peu plus exhaustives, le point "fausses informations" ne semble pas concerné par leurs descriptions non plus :

https://transparency.fb.com/fr-fr/policies/community-standards/misinformation/

En d'autres mots, le blocage est abusif.

Nous supprimons les fausses informations lorsqu’elles sont susceptibles de contribuer directement au risque de blessures physiques imminentes. Nous supprimons également les contenus susceptibles de favoriser directement l’interférence avec le fonctionnement des processus politiques et certains médias manipulés particulièrement trompeurs. Pour déterminer ce qui constitue une fausse information dans ces catégories, nous nous associons à des experts indépendants qui possèdent les connaissances et l’expertise nécessaires pour évaluer la véracité du contenu et déterminer s’il est susceptible de contribuer directement au risque d’une violence imminente. Cela inclut, par exemple, le partenariat avec des organisations de défense des droits de l’homme ayant une présence sur le terrain dans un pays pour déterminer la véracité d’une rumeur sur un conflit civil, et le partenariat avec des autorités sanitaires pendant la pandémie mondiale de COVID-19.

Est-ce que "Conspiracy Watch" ferait parti de leurs "expertises" ?

Ils se sont profilés tôt en tamponnant géocentrisme et créationnisme comme des "théories de complot" ...

Seraient-ce eux?/HGL

FB Abuses the Concept of Spam

Aujourd’hui, à 15:11

À propos de votre commentaire

Seuls les administrateurs du groupe et vous-même pouvez voir ce commentaire.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

14 octobre 2020

6500 ya = 4500 BC. I presume this is carbon years:

2108 B. Chr.
0.730966 pmC/100, so dated as 4708 B. Chr.
2086 B. Chr.
0.743062 pmC/100, so dated as 4536 B. Chr.
2064 B. Chr.
0.754934 pmC/100, so dated as 4364 B. Chr.

In other words, safely or nearly so, between 2108 and 2064 BC, somewhere around 2086 BC.

Just before the birth of Abraham.

https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2020/08/new-tables.html

"Guess what my ancestors did?"

You mean ancestors before a certain Joseph?

Here, marking as "spam" is an abusive way of censorship.

Ce commentaire va à l’encontre de nos Standards de la communauté en matière de spam

Seuls l’auteur du commentaire et les gestionnaires de Christian History and Archaeology peuvent voir ce commentaire.
Nous avons mis en place ces standards pour empêcher des infractions telles que la publicité mensongère, les fraudes et les atteintes à la sécurité.

It is not lying publicity, it is not fraud, and it is not an infringement on security.

Comment nous prenons des décisions

Nous utilisons les mêmes Standards de la communauté dans le monde entier et pour tout le monde sur Facebook.

Nous utilisons la technologie ou une équipe d’examen pour supprimer tout ce qui va à l’encontre de nos standards aussi rapidement que possible.

Notre équipe d’examen travaille dans de nombreuses langues pour veiller à l’application cohérente de nos standards.

Nos standards en matière de spam

Il est interdit d’obtenir des mentions J’aime, des abonnés, des partages ou des vues de vidéos en trompant autrui.
Nous définissons le contenu indésirable comme suit :
• Publier le même commentaire
• Obtenir de fausses mentions J’aime, de faux abonnés, de faux partages ou de fausses vues de vidéos
• Coordonner des mentions J’aime et des partages pour tromper d’autres individus au sujet de la popularité de quelque chose

I have not published the same comment, except by reclicking if not readable first time, I have not acted to obtain fake likes, fake subscribers, fake shares (whatever that is!) or fake viewer stats of a video. I have not coordinated likes and shares to fool any other person on the subject of the popularity of something.

Que voulez-vous faire ?

Étant donné que ce commentaire va à l’encontre de nos Standards de la communauté en matière de contenu indésirable, seuls son auteur et les administrateurs de Christian History and
Archaeology peuvent le voir. Merci de nous indiquer ce que vous souhaitez faire.

Given that in fact it doesn't go against abovementioned standards, I chose the option "contester la décision".

Vous avez contesté la décision

Nous vous offrons généralement la possibilité de demander un nouvel examen et assurons un suivi si nous n’avons pas pris la bonne décision.
Notre équipe d’examinateurs est actuellement réduite en raison de l’épidémie de coronavirus (COVID-19). Nous nous efforçons d’examiner en priorité le contenu le plus susceptible de nuire.
De ce fait, nous ne serons peut-être pas en mesure de vous recontacter, mais votre avis nous aidera à nous améliorer à l’avenir.
Merci pour votre compréhension.

Given that they have a reduced team about this, I am not likely to get my thing through, and it's extra bad that they made it a priority to persecute my comment./HGL

PS, oh look, what is happening on the other account?

This comment goes against our Community Standards on spam

Only the author of the comment and people who manage Catholic Cosmology and Geocentrism can see this comment.

We have these standards to prevent things like false advertising, fraud and security breaches.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

January 14 2020

https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/.../two-magic-wand...
CREAVSEVOLU.BLOGSPOT.COM
Two "Magic Wand" quotes

Still ongoing, 26.III.2022:

Vous ne pouvez pas utiliser cette URL.
Cette URL va à l’encontre de nos Standards de la communauté en matière de spam :
creavsevolu.blogspot.com
Pour protéger les utilisateurs de Facebook de tout contenu indésirable, nous n’autorisons pas les contenus comportant ce type d’URL.

Context:

group status!
If Tolkien is successfully canonized, what do you think would be his patronage ?

Hans-Georg Lundahl
Counter-Biblical alternative realities ...
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/2022/03/tolkiens-elves-are-not-key-to-cains.html

What is Spam?

Vous ne pouvez pas utiliser cette URL.
Cette URL va à l’encontre de nos Standards de la communauté en matière de spam :
notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.com
Pour protéger les utilisateurs de Facebook de tout contenu indésirable, nous n’autorisons pas les contenus comportant ce type d’URL.

It can be noted, this is exactly the blog on which I do general Christian Apologetics, and on which my previous to today's post was a defense of Holy Trinity.

It can also be noted, the FB team in France includes a Muslim of fairly rigorist type. If you add together rigorist attitudes against Christianity and an allowance for Taqqiyya in relation to other religions, you can get why such a man would want to stamp this blog as spam./HGL

PS:

Comment nous prenons des décisions
Nous appliquons les mêmes Standards de communauté dans le monde entier et pour tout le monde sur Facebook.
Nous avons recours à la technologie ou à une équipe d’examen pour supprimer le plus vite possible tout ce qui va à l’encontre de nos standards.
Chaque région du monde a ses propres équipes d’examen formées aux standards.

It just so happens that the French team includes a Muslim. And I don't mean the suave type./HGL

Nos Standards de la communauté
Nous n’autorisons pas la publication de liens trompeurs ou mensongers.
À savoir :
• les sites web adeptes du spam en pop-up ;
• les sites web se faisant passer pour des marques connues ;
• les sites web trompeurs ;
• les URL précédemment publiées par des comptes suspects.

A normal non-aligned, secular, in such a team would not consider Christian apologetics as a fraudulent or lying link.

When it comes to pop up, it is the mode of publication on FB which makes the link clicked pop up.

I do not pretend to be a known trade mark.

I do not cheat - but certain rabid Muslims might not get this when it comes to someone defending Holy Trinity.

My site certainly has already been published by a suspect account, namely my own, which has a few times over been "suspect", but that kind of procedure simply means "we silence whom we want to silence" - step one, make my account suspect, step two, stop me from publishing my own links because my account has been suspect, and probably step three, make my account suspect again, because I just tried to publish a link falling under this rule/HGL

Oh, when it comes to pop-ups, if it's pop-ups in a session of someone seeing the link, it is easy to hack a session with pop-ups so someone can pretend to have detected that my site spreads them./HGL