Are Some Presenting me as Toxic Because of Tolkien?

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: I've Noted Some of My Readers Hate Tolkien · HGL's F.B. writings: Are Some Presenting me as Toxic Because of Tolkien?

Two FB statuses, one on each profile:

I

What's the worst thing that can be said about Tolkien's death?

His son who was at the death bed was, known to his father, celebrating the Novus Ordo. He certainly was a valid priest, ordained in 1946.

Other things on that son may have been unknown to the father.

II

No, Mikael Rosén, Sedevacantist Catholic and (at least formerly) National Socialist, a combination not possible in Tanus, he didn't leave FB, he blocked me (on my other profile).

Last interaction we had, he had a meme with "maybe I was raised wrong, but if we wanted sth, we worked for it", I guessed a kind of criticism some may have of me, and I actually responded accordingly, showing last list of my work which presents the production in a comprehensive way, the production of April.

A similar list of May is so far not yet extant, as May isn't finished yet.

New blog on the kid: Production April 2026
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2026/04/production-april-2026.html

As I mentioned to him and as you can verify, it links back to earlier lists (March 2026, which links to February 2026 ...)

Fake Patristics

New blog on the kid: What is Jeremias 31:34 affirming? · HGL's F.B. writings: Fake Patristics

Mikael Rosén

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"Indeed it is better to keep quite about our beliefs, and live them out, than to talk eloquently about what we believe, but fail to live by it." ???

Couldn't find even "talk eloquently" in his letters online. Including the spurious ones.

Also (as much) from St. Ignatius:

"Beware of fake Patristics quotes on the internet" ...

To me, the idea sounds very much like what the KGB would make the Patriarchate of Moscow regurgitate and then blame the Church Fathers for it, like, also, denial of Young Earth Creationism or the idea of taking Genesis as allegorically only.

Above was after an F-search in his epistles.

I double checked. Google searched, found a longer quote about tree and fruit and F-searched "fruit" instead. It actually could well count as a summary or excerpt of this passage in his Epistle to the Ephesians, especially if from a different translation:

Chapter 14. Exhortations to faith and love

None of these things is hid from you, if you perfectly possess that faith and love towards Christ Jesus 1 Timothy 1:14 which are the beginning and the end of life. For the beginning is faith, and the end is love. 1 Timothy 1:5 Now these two, being inseparably connected together, are of God, while all other things which are requisite for a holy life follow after them. No man [truly] making a profession of faith sins; 1 John 3:7 nor does he that possesses love hate any one. The tree is made manifest by its fruit; Matthew 12:33 so those that profess themselves to be Christians shall be recognised by their conduct. For there is not now a demand for mere profession, but that a man be found continuing in the power of faith to the end.

Chapter 15. Exhortation to confess Christ by silence as well as speech

It is better for a man to be silent and be [a Christian], than to talk and not to be one. It is good to teach, if he who speaks also acts. There is then one Teacher, who spoke and it was done; while even those things which He did in silence are worthy of the Father. He who possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to hear even His very silence, that he may be perfect, and may both act as he speaks, and be recognised by his silence. There is nothing which is hid from God, but our very secrets are near to Him. Let us therefore do all things as those who have Him dwelling in us, that we may be His temples, 1 Corinthians 6:19 and He may be in us as our God, which indeed He is, and will manifest Himself before our faces. Wherefore we justly love Him.

The very next chapters speak of false teachers, defined as people who destroy families, and of false doctrine.

I added a new comment:

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Actually, this is not totally off.

Here is the source:

The Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0104.htm

My Writings are NOT Outflows from My Innermost Devotion and are NOT Meant to be Seen and Read by God Alone

New blog on the kid: Some Guys on CMI Might be Overdoing Work Ethic · HGL's F.B. writings: My Writings are NOT Outflows from My Innermost Devotion and are NOT Meant to be Seen and Read by God Alone

I am writing as a writer, not as a man trying to converse with God.

My words are directed to readers whom I presume decently intelligent, but perhaps ignorant in some detail, not to God who reads my heart and kidneys. SOME evil peoople in the Catholic Church don't seem to get it. Here is an example on FB, with my comment below:

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Not true of bread baking.

You didn't get paid to bake Pågens that no one could find and you distributed only among the poor, you got paid becaue in Sweden Pågens is a well publicised bakery.

If it wasn't Pågens, sorry.

Similarily G.K. Chesterton (who got decorated by Pope Pius XI) didn't earn his money for the house on Beaconsfield by distributing GKC's Weekly ONLY among very few clergy.

There is a huge difference between professional production and individual acts of charity as they flow from grace. Did I get my point through this time, Sir?

UPDATE:

Phil Friedl

Status

How can you hear the whispers of the Holy Ghost if you do not love silence?

Pope Michael II

Silence is golden.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

I do not love noise.

I do very much like writing.

Do NOT try to get me out of my trade just to give me spirituality.

As for silence from noise, I have more of it when writing at night.

However, my hope is to marry ... not to be the kind of person who cultivates silence at all times.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Is this video I came across in answer to your prayers, and was the point just to show me, my proposal is impossible or I have to change plans?

If You're Thinking of Writing a Book, Watch This
Lauren Erickson | 9 Nov. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js2_H5dIBe4

Because, I know the late Pope Michael I was fairly dismissive of my writing as a source of income, after he had tried to sell a reprinted tract about 9 condemnations of Heliocentrism via Amazon.

If he had asked me for advice, I'd have councelled him to create a pontifical printing press. Perhaps I even mentioned it. AND to get someone to do marketting even outside big companies like Amazon. I think the advice she gives from experience is more of a condemnation of his tactics than of mine.

Rosén, vs Nygren

Mikael Rosén

4 mars 2024

Isak Nygren

Nej, verkligen inte. Katolska kyrkan grundades på 300-talet.

Mikael Rosén

Isak Nygren Petrus var alltså inte "Klippan" dvs. den förste påven?

Isak Nygren

Mikael Rosén Petrus var aldrig någon påve.

Marcus von Gdansk

Isak Nygren Du har helt fel.

Pope-Fiction | Av Peter Madrid
Labarum | Berndt David Assarsson | 23 mars 2011
https://labarum.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/pope-fiction/

Isak Nygren

Marcus von Gdansk Humor när en blogg försöker bevisa något utan att lyckas. Hade katoliker följt Bibeln hade de inte varit katoliker.

Marcus von Gdansk

Isak Nygren Humor när en icke-katolik inte förstår Skriften utan försöker lära oss katoliker något om vår egen heliga Skrift. Stor humor också hur historiskt illitterata protestanter är, "Katolska kyrkan grundades på 300-talet" 😆

Isak Nygren

Marcus von Gdansk Jag är inte protestant. Ni katoliker tror att ni ligger bakom Bibeln. Om det vore sant, så är det märkligt att ni polyteister tar avstånd från precis allt Bibeln förespråkar. Själv är jag teolog som har studerat Bibeln på originalspråken. Ni katoliker (och ortodoxa) har mer gemensamt med hinduismen än med biblisk tro.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Isak Nygren Du nämnde hinduismen ...

Antar du tänker på mantras, rosenkrans, Jesus-bön, tungotal ...?

Och Mt. 6:7?

Om du nu är theolog, antar jag att du känner till rot-orden bakom sammansättningen batto-logein, samt den hedniska samtiden i Romarriket. Det var intet Ashoka som mynten i dåtidens Palestina buro bilden af, utan Caesar ... Har du lust att klargöra litet?

Isak Nygren

Hans-Georg Lundahl Jag känner till vad som troddes på i romarriket. Jag gjorde en mer modern jämförelse med nutida religioner.

Hinduismen (t ex krishnaismen) definierar sin gudom på ett liknande sätt som katoliker och ortodoxa gör. De säger att det endast finns en gud, men dyrkar olika avatarer. Många låtsaskristna gör något liknande. Treenigheten är en liknelse, men ännu fler liknelser har man med idoldyrkandet när katoliker och ortodoxa ber till döda människor.

Folk dyrkade inte Caesar. Jesus praktiskt taget separerade religionen från staten med sin myntliknelse.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Jag noterar att du undvek frågan.

Ang. ditt påstående skulle helgon vara jemförbara med avatarer ... menade du Treenigheten med? Är du JV?

Men ok, du tar den sidan ... vet du hvilka fem religioner hedniska romare blandade ihop till en? Hinduism, Buddhism, Judendom, Christendom, Bacchus-dyrkan. Altsammans sammanfattades som "Bacchus-dyrkan" ungefär som tidig germansk Odens-dyrkan betecknades som Mercurius-dyrkan af Tacitus.

Att du nu tar hinduism som "källa" till en "förorenad" Christendom är märkligt om du anser att ROMAREN Constantin förfalskade tron. Som sagt, han var efterfölgare till Tiberius Caesar, som dyrkade Jupiter snarare än Bacchus. Intet till Ashoka. Har jag lyckats klargöra hvar jag anser ditt argument är ytterst svagt?

Tänker du undvika DET argumentet med, som du gjorde med min anmärkning om batto-logein?

Tillagdt

efter två dars tigande från Isaks sida.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Isak Nygren "Folk dyrkade inte Caesar."

Underlig commentar, dessutom, från en theolog.

Christna dödades på löpande band för vägran att offra till kejsarens genius.

Är du en sådan der GT-exeget som helt undviker NT i vanliga fall och tagit infon från halfglömda minnen af föreläsningar med conversationer under en caffe-rast?

Men min hufvudpoäng var altså att Tiberius dyrkade Jupiter, intet Brahma, Vishnu och Shiva. Så din theorie om var Catholska Kyrkans gudsuppfattning kommer från är ytterst mysko.

Motsatt proportion af närvaro afsaknad är hvad Ashokas välde skulle ge vid handen.

Marcus von Gdansk

Isak Nygren Med det svaret är du lika mycket "teolog" som jag är kejsare av Kina.

Att det är Katolska Kyrkan som sammanställt Bibeln är ett obestridligt historiskt faktum. Så att ni heretiker ska låtsas undervisa oss om vår egen bok är bara ett dåligt skämt.

Isak Nygren

Hans-Georg Lundahl Du skriver helt obegripligt. Jag är inte JV, men de har betydligt mer rätt än vad Katolska kyrkan har.

Isak Nygren

Marcus von Gdansk Om det vore sant att Katolska kyrkan sammanställde Bibeln, så är det ännu märkligare att RKK inte följer sin egen skrift. Ni heretiker vet inte ens vad som står i Bibeln. Antingen följer man Bibeln eller så följer man katolicismen i detta fall. T o m muslimer följer Bibeln bättre än katoliker. Ni är polyteister och därmed inte kristna.

Marcus von Gdansk

Isak Nygren Du lider uppenbarligen av vanföreställningar. Jag önskar dig lycka till och ber för dig.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

Isak Nygren "Du skriver helt obegripligt."

Du svarar ytterst tactiskt.

Har du blifvit grundligen vederlagd, är det ju enklast att låtsas att den som gjorde det är obegriplig.

Vore det nu händelsevis ngt du hade svårt att begripa, huru vore det med en direct fråga?